<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Intriguing Theory</title>
	<link>http://rabenstrange.com/2007/03/05/an-intriguing-theory/</link>
	<description>Adventures in 日本</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tarrick Twilight</title>
		<link>http://rabenstrange.com/2007/03/05/an-intriguing-theory/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarrick Twilight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rabenstrange.com/2007/03/05/an-intriguing-theory/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>It really depends on the spec that a woman is looking for. Generally Men are speced "Humorous", "Serious", "Romantic", or "Mysterious" or some combo of each. It just happens that most women (at one point or another) like humor, so the "Humorous" spec is a successful one, assume you are geared and trained correctly.

And no, I do not play too much games.



Srsrly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really depends on the spec that a woman is looking for. Generally Men are speced &#8220;Humorous&#8221;, &#8220;Serious&#8221;, &#8220;Romantic&#8221;, or &#8220;Mysterious&#8221; or some combo of each. It just happens that most women (at one point or another) like humor, so the &#8220;Humorous&#8221; spec is a successful one, assume you are geared and trained correctly.</p>
<p>And no, I do not play too much games.</p>
<p>Srsrly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trebonte</title>
		<link>http://rabenstrange.com/2007/03/05/an-intriguing-theory/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Trebonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rabenstrange.com/2007/03/05/an-intriguing-theory/#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>And thus we are all brought back to the main fact that women are indeed overpowered and corresponding nerfs are needed.

That is an interesting theory but it's only taking one aspect of it and running with it. It could be expanded upon and improved. Hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thus we are all brought back to the main fact that women are indeed overpowered and corresponding nerfs are needed.</p>
<p>That is an interesting theory but it&#8217;s only taking one aspect of it and running with it. It could be expanded upon and improved. Hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Seeberger</title>
		<link>http://rabenstrange.com/2007/03/05/an-intriguing-theory/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Seeberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rabenstrange.com/2007/03/05/an-intriguing-theory/#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>I'm curious how far you could take that theory on an anthropological, biological, and social historical level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious how far you could take that theory on an anthropological, biological, and social historical level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
